### Controversy Over Proposed Terrorism Law Replacement 📉

Policy Shift: The National People’s Power (NPP) government is facing criticism for introducing the Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PSTA) as a replacement for the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), despite manifesto promises of a total repeal. Legal Concerns: Critics argue the draft PSTA prioritizes "the State" over citizens, maintaining a framework for surveillance and detention that contradicts international human rights standards and UN Resolution A/HRC/RES/60/1. Sector & Community Impact: Minority Rights: Concerns remain that the new law will continue to disproportionately affect the Tamil and Muslim communities, citing past instances of prolonged detentions without charges. Civil Society: Activists demand the complete abrogation of draconian laws to protect civil rights and democratic dissent, rather than "rebranding" existing architecture. Governance & Accountability: The transition from the JVP’s history as a victim of the PTA to the NPP’s role in drafting the PSTA is highlighted as a significant political pivot. The ongoing investigations into the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks and potential state intelligence involvement underscore the urgent need for a transparent, people-centric security framework. _Note: Summary based on published commentary and provisional legislative drafts as of March 2026._ ---