📈 Sri Lanka Eyes Stronger Regulations on Non-Sugar Sweeteners

A recent assessment by the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) highlights a critical gap in Sri Lanka's health policies as manufacturers shift from sugar to non-sugar sweeteners (NSS) to bypass current regulations. • Current Policy Gaps The existing Traffic Light Labelling (TLL) and SSB excise tax focus solely on sugar content. This has led to a surge in NSS use, with 70% of green-labeled and 50% of amber-labeled beverages now containing artificial sweeteners, potentially misleading consumers. • Health Implications While used to meet "low sugar" thresholds, the WHO warns that long-term NSS consumption is linked to increased risks of Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and obesity. NCDs currently account for nearly 75% of all deaths in Sri Lanka. • Global Benchmarks & Recommendations Taxation: Countries like India and the Philippines tax both sugar and artificial sweeteners. Labelling: Mexico and Argentina use "Warning Labels" for NSS to prevent consumer misperception. School Policy: Prohibiting the sale and marketing of NSS-containing products within school premises to protect younger demographics. • Strategic Outlook The IPS advocates for a "Nutrient Profile" model to close loopholes. Key recommendations include expanding the SSB tax to cover NSS and updating Front-of-Pack Labelling (FOPL) to include prominent warnings, encouraging the beverage sector to move toward genuinely healthier formulations.