### Think Tank Report: Sri Lankan EIAs Failing on Social Impact Reporting 📈

A new study by the Centre for a Smart Future (CSF) reveals critical gaps in how Environmental Impact Assessments (EIAs) in Sri Lanka evaluate and communicate social risks. Despite being a legal requirement, the "social dimension" is frequently overlooked, threatening project accountability and public trust. • Study Scope & Methodology The report, titled _'Assessing the Assessments,'_ is the first systematic review of its kind in Sri Lanka. It analyzed 250 EIA reports published between 1991 and 2025 against national guidelines and specific Terms of Reference (ToRs). • Key Findings & Systemic Issues • Frequent Gaps: Major inconsistencies in reporting methods and data sources. • Inaccessibility: Presentation and language styles are often too technical or complex for the affected public to understand. • ToR Inconsistency: Quality expectations vary significantly across different project-specific guidelines. • Vulnerability: Poor reporting fails to protect communities already exposed to environmental and economic risks. • Economic & Development Implications The study emphasizes that high-quality social impact reporting is vital for: • Investor Confidence: Reducing risks of conflict and litigation. • Climate Resilience: Ensuring infrastructure can withstand heightened environmental hazards. • Infrastructure Delivery: Accelerating sustainable investment through better decision-making. _Note: Findings are based on CSF's analysis of historical and provisional data up to early 2026._